But wait ...
I think it was Rachel Alexander who said: “Since the Democratic National Committee emails were leaked a few weeks ago, three people associated with the DNC have all been found dead under what could be questionable circumstances.”
Asked to please shut upI am not supposed to talk about the so-called "Clinton body count." Such talk is the kiss of death among my Democratic brothers and sisters. Yet truthfully, I have mixed feelings about the topic.
One of my friends stopped following me on Facebook today, partly because I have mentioned this topic. She said I was "worse than Fox News," which she knows I detest. This in turn made me go back and revisit the so-called "body count" allegations. to see if I had made a mistake, but I don't think I did. Here is what I found ... bodies! They were real. They are unsettling, unnerving. They call for answers. Even if only one of them died under suspicious circumstances it would be alarming, regardless of who the perpetrators are. And yet we know almost for certain that one was murdered, and the others are kind of like, "Do you smell a skunk in the woodpile?" Maybe yes, maybe no. But probably yes. So here they are, the bodies:
Seth Rich -- Seth was murdered, no evidence, no word from investigators, no established motive . It might be worth mentioning that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange (allegedly) "appeared to suggest" Tuesday that Seth was the source of Wikileaks' DNC fraud emails.
Nobody as yet knows who shot Seth or why, although there are plenty of theories.
Sean Lucas -- Shawn had just sued the DNC for alleged fraud: On Aug. Sean had filed papers against the DNC and DNC head Debbie Wasserman. He also had filed a class-action law suit representing Sanders supporters, claiming he campaign had fraudulently taken money from them under the auspices of what was supposed to have been a neutral campaign. But on Aug. 2, Lucas/ girlfriend reportedly found him lying on the bathroom floor. though he had been in good health, he was now dead.
John Ashe -- John was a former president of the United Nations General Assembly. Interestingly, he was scheduled to begin pretrial meetings involving shady financial dealings regarding a former Clinton crony, but On June 22, 2016 he was found dead. The cause of death was first reported as a heart attack, but then the story changed: Local police reportedly said “his throat had been crushed, presumably by a barbell he dropped while pumping iron.”"*
Three startling" deaths in a row surrounding Clinton's nomination are not proof of wrongdoing, and more satisfying explanations (for some or all of those deaths) could come out in time ... or maybe not.Never mind that forty-something other people opposing a Clinton are said to have have died in unusual circumstances over the years. This is the fantasy stuff of of the Republican rubbish mill, am I correct? Only a hard core conspiracy theorist would suggest that most or all of them were ordered killed by the Clinton family or close associates, and I would certainly would not entertain that thought. Or at least I didn't until this evening..It does seem remarkable to me that these three died in this short time frame, and all were involved with testimonies or documentation or court cases that likely would have proven very damaging to Clinton, if only the individuals had survived.
Trying shoes on other feetLet's face it: If these victims (Do you mind terribly if I call them that?). If they had been set to testify against Republicans and had died in exactly the same manner, would Democrats' responses been so casual, or even hostile to the question. Would they be so strongly insisting that all of this is nothing but a "fluke"? Perhaps. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Scratch that question.
Mental imagingYes, I mean that: I do not accuse Clinton of being linked to the deaths ... not yet. I have no proof, no evidence. So for now, sitting here in the relative safety of my living-room watching The Olympics, I consider her innocent, innocent before the law and deserving of the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand, let's do a bit of creative thinking: Choose one of three roles and let's role play.
Please humor me: Imagine for a few seconds, that you are a fraud investigator like Seth Rich, with information suggesting fraud in the DNC, that you have just turned over to Wikileaks. **.
Or fantasize briefly that you are now an attorney like Sean Lucas, in the process of suing the DNC: on allegations of fraud.
Or if you really want to trip out, pretend that, like John Ashe, you are suddenly an Ambassador set to attend pretrial meetings concerning what you believe are "shady financial dealings" of a former Clinton crony...
How does this change your perspective, if at all?
If you are like me, you might feel concerns about your prospects for a long and happy life.
Or, what if you were a candidate who really threatened Clinton's bid for the Presidency. What if you were a Bernie Sanders? Would you be a bit queasy?
I rest my case. This is not a court of law, and I am not accusing anyone of anything: I am just saying what my feelings would be in that kind of situation. What would your feelings be?
Comments are welcome: If you liked this post, please like and Share or Plus+
Disclaimer: I am not claiming this is a conspiracy. It does seem, however, like a set of "unusual" circumstances.
*News reports say Ashe would have testified in just days along with Chinese businessman, Ng Lap Seng.
Seng was accused of smuggling $4.5 million into the U.S. He also was.identified as “the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars illegally funneled ... to the Democratic National Committee during the Clinton administration.”
**Assange strongly implied he had turned such information over to Wikileaks.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/3-dead-spark-new-interest-in-clinton-body-count/#2wrFr2zbG4d4kxAh.99